Skip to main content

Walkbot Robot-Assisted Gait Training Effects in Posture, Gait, Balance, Spasticity, and Brain Activities with Cerebral Palsy

Walkbot Robot-Assisted Gait Training Effects in Posture, Gait, Balance, Spasticity, and Brain Activities in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy
The prevalence of cerebral palsy (CP) is fairly high, ranging from 2 to 3 per 1000 live births. CP is a heterogeneous mix of disorders with a hallmark symptom of locomotor and postural-control deficits of varying severity due to brain injury.

Conventional physical therapy (CPT), including neurodevelopmental treatment, partial weight support treadmill training, and strength training based on resistance exercises have been used broadly to improve balance and gait function. However, CPT is labor-intensive to therapists, increases the risk of falling, and lacks a sufficient repetition training to induce brain plasticity. To mitigate the inherent problems of CPT, a company recently developed Walkbot robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) system for individuals with CP.

Therefore, the present study has two purposes. The first one is to compare the effects of conventional gait training and Walkbot robot-assisted gait training on standing function, walking, running, jumping function, balance, gait speed, spasticity in patients with CP. The second is to determine the differences of the Walkbot RAGT group’s brain and muscle activation before and after the 18 sessions of intervention via electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG).

We enrolled twenty children with CP (10 males and 10 females; mean age 15.95 ± 1.82 years) from a city hospital and rehabilitation center in South Korea. Ten children with CP completed 18 sessions (30 minutes per session) of RAGT plus CPT. Another ten individuals with CP underwent only 18 sessions of CPT. Outcome measures were assessed before and after the 18 sessions of each intervention. The clinical outcome instruments used in our study were Gross motor function measure (GMFM)-88, Pediatric balance scale (PBS), 10-meter waking test (10-MWT), and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). Neurophysiological test were EEG frequency band power, activated EEG electrode location and topography, gait event-related spectral perturbations, and EMG on lower extremities. Analysis of covariance and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the RAGT and CPT groups and paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre-test and post-test performance in each group.

The self-selected velocity between pre-test and post-test in the CPT group showed significant change (p < 0.05) in the intragroup clinical test comparison.

At the same time, other variables had no significant changes (p > 0.05). However, the RAGT group post-test had improved values on GMFM D, GMFM E, PBS, and the self-selected speed on 10-MWT (p < 0.05) compared to those in the pre-test. There were no significant effects related to the muscle response, angle of the Tardieu scale, and fast velocity in 10-MWT (p > 0.05).

GMFM E, PBS, and self-selected velocity in 10-MWT in the RAGT group presented better results than the CPT group (p < 0.05). GMFM D had a tendency for better outcomes in RAGT than the CPT group (p = 0.063). The modified Tardieu scale and fast velocity in 10-MWT had no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Though no significant EEG band power data changes in the RAGT group were observed in the prefrontal area (Fp1, Fp2), supplementary motor area (FC1, FC2), left sensorimotor cortex (C1, C3), right sensorimotor cortex (C2, C4), and somatosensory association cortex (Cz, CP1, CP2, Pz) between the pre-test and post-test (p > 0.05), the low gamma (γ) band (25-40 Hz) on Cz had low tendency to change after the intervention (p = 0.095). However, there was a positive qualitative change shown in the gait cycle event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and topography.

The EMG analysis in the RAGT group showed a 12.8% increase of the left tibialis anterior muscle activation in comparison with the pre-test (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, muscle activation of the right tibialis anterior muscle and gastrocnemius medialis muscle had no statistical significances (p > 0.05)

Compared to the CPT group, Therefore, the Walkbot RAGT group was superior in standing and walking performance, balance parameters, and gait speed in self-selected conditions. Several research has been dedicated to the cortical activity during RAGT; however, this study utilized a novel experimental set up to measure the cortico-muscular contribution in RAGT in individual with CP. Though we did not find significant changes in the brain activities in RAGT, several activated brain area related locomotion existed in qualitative research. We did establish increased tibialis anterior muscle activation. It is important to note that the engagement of these activated cortical structures was not exactly equal to providing evidence for neuroplasticity. Further research is necessary to provide an in-depth interpretation of the cortico-muscular activities on the EEG signal and to compare neurophysiological assessment results with the CPT group.


View Walkbot clinical papers


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Walkbot Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation series

Walkbot is a state-of-the-art lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot that provides natural walking movements and various training programs for patients with walking disorders due to stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, etc. Walkbot Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation have 5 models. 3 for adults and 2 for pediatrics.   1. Walkbot Premim for Adult a. Ankle-knee-hip joints synchronization b. Interactive training c. 3D Motion simulation d. Robot sensitivity setting e. Dynamic BWSTT f. Automatic leg length adjustment g. Active augmented reality feedback software (optional) h. Force plate (optional) 2. Walkbot S for Adult a. Ankle-knee-hip joints synchronization b. Interactive training c. 3D Motion simulation d. Robot sensitivity setting e. Dual BWSTT (Static type) f. Automatic leg length adjustment g. Active augmented reality feedback software (optional) 3. Walkbot G for Adult a. Ankle-knee-hip joints synchronization b. Interactive training c. 3D Motion simulation d. Robot sen...

Indications and contraindications of Walkbot Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation

Information about indications and contraindications is one of the most frequently asked questions. Thus, we prepared a post for basic indications and contraindications of Walkbot.  Indications and contraindications of Walkbot Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation(1)  Indications and contraindications of Walkbot Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation(2) 워크봇(Walkbot) 보행재활로봇 적응증 & 금기증 #WALKBOT #RobotAssistedGaitTraining   #RoboticGaitTraining #LowerLimbRehabilitationRobot #RoboticRehabilitation #GaitTraining #RehabilitationRobot #Rehabilitation #Stroke #CerebralPalsy  #Neuroplasticity 

A Walkbot instructor visited Bangkok Hospital in Thailand to conduct in-depth clinical training

Bangkok Hospital is a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. It was opened in 1972 by a team of physicians, pharmacists and 30 nurses.  It is one of the largest privately owned hospitals in Southeast Asia.  The original hospital became the Bangkok Hospital Group, now Thailand's largest hospital operator with 40 locations in major cities throughout Thailand. Bangkok Hospital in Thailand Since 2019, Walkbot,  Lower-Limb rehabilitation robot  has been installed at the rehabilitation center of Bangkok Hospital, providing state-of-the-art walking rehabilitation training services to patients in Bangkok, Thailand.  Walkbot  installed at the rehabilitation center On April 27, 2022, a Walkbot instructor visited Bangkok Hospital in Thailand to  conduct in-depth clinical training.  Walkbot in-depth clinical Training (1) Even during busy hospital work, about 10 rehabilitation doctors and physical therapists at Bangkok Hospital attended in-depth training and successfu...